Friday, February 19, 2010

Meeting face-to-face

Anyone who knows me is well aware that I am technologically inept. Though I have eagerly embraced my computer for writing and the Internet for research and email, beyond that, not a clue! And it took me a very long time to get even this far. There was a time when my old newspaper had to hide a standard typewriter from me in case I pitched a fit about converting to electric. I did.

Lately, however, I have been persuaded that I should be on Facebook. Because I had no idea how to accomplish that, visiting friends took all of my basic information and picture home to Atlanta and got me signed up. I actually found the page all by myself. I even nabbed a few friends.

And then Facebook, bless its heart, changed their profile pages and I had to mentally scrap what little I knew and try to figure out how to get where I was going all over again. Keep in mind that I am doing this on a computer that's not only a dinosaur, but relies on dial-up. Facebook is tortoise-slow under these conditions. I am an impatient person. It's not a good mix.

However, to all of you who happen to be on Facebook, I am happy to have friends. I know how to confirm you. I've even figured out how to make a comment or two on the posts. I am, sadly, lacking in the patience to actually wait for the messages to appear, so if you want a quick response from me to something specific, I still suggest you use my email, I've mastered that. I can even do it in a heartbeat on my iPhone.

It is my fervent hope to use Facebook to keep you up-to-date on what I'm doing, where I'm going to be whenever I'm on tour, that kind of thing.

Until I've figured it out, though, know that I will be in Columbus, Ohio from April 28 through May 2 for the annual Romantic Times convention. I'll even be hosting a tea to celebrate the release of Sweet Tea at Sunrise, the second book of the new Sweet Magnolia trilogy coming out in April, May and June. So, if you're going to RT, check out the tea on Saturday afternoon and request a ticket. They'll be limited, so do it soon.

If you live in Columbus, but don't plan to attend the conference, keep an eye out for any booksignings I might do in town. After all, I went to college at Ohio State and worked in Columbus for several years. It's a town I love, so I'm very anxious to get back there and hopefully cross paths with some old friends and meet some new ones...this time face-to-face.

In the meantime, if you are on Facebook, check out my page and say hello. One way or another, I'll try to welcome you.

Sherryl Woods

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Who's in charge here?

I've been hearing a lot lately about personal accountability. It's usually been in connection with discussions about whether the government should be interceding in a whole host of things from health care to texting while driving.

Now, believe me, as an absolute control freak who hates anyone telling me what to do, I get why people don't want the government making more rules and regulations about much of anything. I can barely tolerate some of the rules here in my condo, and they're pretty benign.

That said, however, I also figure my right to live life on my terms and by my rules pretty much ends when it infringes on someone else's rights, endangers their life, or takes money out of their pocket.

Here's what set me off about this. The Florida Legislature may at long last allow a bill to ban texting while driving to get out of committee and come up for a vote this year. Various bills in the past have died for a lack of will from legislators with the spine of an overcooked spaghetti noodle. Their excuse has been that people should be held personally accountable for their behavior, and the state shouldn't interfere.

By that logic, there should be no laws against drunk driving, or driving while impaired with drugs or, what the heck, without so much as a valid driver's license. Just like drinking and driving, texting while driving is dangerous. It's stupid. And way too often, it's teens who are barely paying attention to the road in the first place, who are doing it. Ditto with cell phone usage. How many lives are going to be lost before people get it? Cell phones and a couple of thousand pounds of metal, combined with high speeds and other distracted drivers, flat-out don't mix?

Should a law be necessary when something's so obvious? In a perfect world, no. We'd all be smart enough to realize that even if we're willing to die so we can make sure our friends know we're going to be late to lunch, we shouldn't kill anyone else in the process. Sadly, that's not the case.

Just the other day in a mall parking lot, a woman driving an SUV and talking on her cell phone tried to maneuver her car into a space with only one hand on the wheel. She missed and hit the neighboring car, all with me standing right there watching her. Did she look even vaguely chagrined? No. Did she put down the cell phone before her next attempt? No. She was laughing, as she continued talking. What a hoot, huh?

So, in our less than perfect world, somebody has to set at least the most basic of rules to protect the rest of us from those who don't have the sense God gave a duck. You wouldn't think a lawmaker, confronted with the mangled cars from numerous accidents involving cell phones and/or texting, would have to think twice.

If you'd like to rant about this -- or to argue with me -- feel free to hit comment below and chime in.

In the meantime, though, drive safely.

Sherryl Woods

Labels: , ,

Add to Technorati Favorites